Lawlight said:
So, it's not anti-gay and not political, so what is the issue? |
The issue is it not defined, the original would have been covered by the electrol act in regards to adverising , the dept of statstics isn't covered by those laws so in the govt wanting to get this off the agenda they rushed this out without putting in any advertising guidlines , so instead we had a network trying to decide what constitutes a political message something that the agency incharge should have been empowered to do.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot