| DélioPT said: ... |
Lol it wasn't implied in anyway you've effectively admitted to making that part up even the Vita part was never said or implied either, you've admitted to fabricating a point to argue against here. 360 was anounced 3 years into the platforms life not 4 years unless you believe MS anounced it then released it the next day, MS themselves even started developing 360 2 years into the Xbox's life.
You combined the total of around 7-8 consoles across 3 generations to compare to the GB the kicker is that it was a flawed attempt at rebutting the point which was about performance of the portable market and guess what 118m is on par or better than their home console counterparts performance hardly rocket science to understand. As for your quote I read back through each post and the is not what you say in any of them either you read a typo before it was corrected or you skim read each post.
Again your quote not only says nothing to back your stance but also contradicts your own argument earlier when you were arguing that DS was a third pillar and not part of the GB range now you're using quotes confirming it was a GBA successor, not only that you failed to remember I already told you new platforms are always in development and to further add irony to the final part of your post you again quote something out of context because that part of the post was referring to the 3DS and ended up proving your own earlier argument wrong, congratulations you debunked yourself.
