Report: White House weighing a tax on remittances to Mexico to fund border wall

[TheWPCTraveler]

VGPolyglot said:

TheWPCTraveler said:

What part of the italicised did you miss? The text implies that I could go on, but elect not to.

This could serve as the breakout opportunity for a fantastic alternative material for, say, load-bearing walls. Or, it could be the rallying cry that allows Mexico to rally around one hero to break their narco-political problems once and for all. Or, this can create a literal "tourist trap," eheheheh. And so on and so forth. 

The point is that there are upsides to the wall, too, you know.

So then, by saying so-on and so forth, you're implying that it is beneficial to all sides, just that you don't want to go into detail? I guess there are upsides, if it's a huge wall we'll have to look up to attempt to get to the other side XD

To answer your question, yes.

This entire exchange is an illustration of the fact that people on the internet need to clarify their points from the get-go better, to avoid being misinterpreted by others.