By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheWPCTraveler said:
VGPolyglot said:

You say all sides, but then only mention the Republicans and Democrats. While they may be the two dominant political parties, there are obviously other sides that would prefer there not to be a wall, namely people that have to cross the border frequently.

What part of the italicised did you miss? The text implies that I could go on, but elect not to.

This could serve as the breakout opportunity for a fantastic alternative material for, say, load-bearing walls. Or, it could be the rallying cry that allows Mexico to rally around one hero to break their narco-political problems once and for all. Or, this can create a literal "tourist trap," eheheheh. And so on and so forth. 

The point is that there are upsides to the wall, too, you know.

So then, by saying so-on and so forth, you're implying that it is beneficial to all sides, just that you don't want to go into detail? I guess there are upsides, if it's a huge wall we'll have to look up to attempt to get to the other side XD