By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:
OdinHades said:

Starting World War 3 sounds like one hell of a plan! If you nuke NK, you will cause colletaral damage in China and Russia, on top of that China will never let a unified Korea under NATO-control happen. So in all essence, if the US shoots the first missile, World War 3 is upon us and life on this planet as we know it will essentially end. Sounds like one hell of a plan! China has made very clear that they will only stay neutral if NK fires the first shot.

That aside, it's not like Kim Jong-un doesn't have good reasons to act like he does. The reason for this is the US itself and how it behaved in the last decades. They invaded countries rather randomly, fighting everywhere where they thought something "bad" was going on, playing world police. Small countries that do not fit the Agenda of the US can not trust them because of that. So the only way to be secure of the bullying of the west is to have the nuke. That's why NK is doing everything it can to achieve a considerable nuclear arsenal. It's the only way they can be sure to never be attacked by the US.

^ so much that.

StarOcean what you said, could so easily go really really wrong.

I actually think its safer if the US slipped some assasins accross the boarder and they took down the leader.

Then when it happends, the US goes "Someone shot him?! Oh thats too bad. It wasnt us that did it".

However even that carries some risk, if it goes wrong, you might get a nuke strike sent your way.

So no risk at all? :P

Anyway, a full on war against NK would help absolutely no one. You just need to remove the upper echelon somehow. Maybe even support a military coup. Because whatever replaces the current leader cannot possibly be worse.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.