AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Wouldn't there be radiation poisoning if we nuked North Korea? Why would we take radiated land ... |
Well we have weapons that could level entire cities and make them look like not much was there, or we could use a neutron bomb and radiate the country, but leave the buildings intact.
Russia has a bomb that can basically makes the surface area ook like that of the moon.
I'd honestly go for heavy ground weaponry (bunker busters/artillery/rockets/MRBM) than resorting to nukes, mostly because nukes would irradiate the area and destroy the land, making it both a pain in the ass to clean up the radiation and to make use of what land is left (though the radiation and blast/fallout damage would make using the land more difficult of a task).
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.







