Kasz216 said:
1) It's not in the article but it is in the second paragraph with the other parsed data. (Of online console players.) If it wasn't part of that it would be in a paragraph up top. It is out of place in that pargraph otherwise. 2) If I had access to that study I would be bound by the terms of access to the study to not publically disseminate the results of it. For what it's worth most sites have infact reported the % as inclusive. |
Hmm. I have re-read the article several times now. I have to say that I believe you've misread it. Can you post some quotes (from the article) that clarify your position? Its an article with a lot of spin in it, so I can see how easily misinterpreted it can be (and has been).