Zkuq said:
1. Thanks! Looks like too much reading to get a firm idea of whether the decision was sound or not, but I think I got a general idea of the case. 2. I guess I should have elaborated in the first place instead of assuming you'd understand what I meant. Technically my argument wasn't what you say it is, it just seems that way because of my poor expression. My bad. Anyway, I'm still waiting for your answer to which part of emulators violates which copyrighted property, because I can't find any. |
They violate the copyright on the bios code, by using it.







