By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
outlawauron said:
morenoingrato said:

I didn't really condone the Vita trolling on the thread, heck, I'd be satisfied if it were in every platform.

I do disagree about the uncertainty. Not just for SE, but in general. Games keep getting announced, more often than not without Switch support, and considering how little third party support Nintendo got the past 2 gens (granted, with pretty good reasons) I can see Nintendo fans worried about games.

By this point you can count high profile Switch releases or upcoming ones on your fingers. This game is not graphically intensive, so that decision is even more astonishing.

So if history shows that Nintendo platforms do not get much third party support, why is there so much shock and horror when the Switch doesn't get the same level of support as other platforms. Should it not be an expectation? I don't understand where the confidence that every game must be on Switch comes from.

Regardless of history, a new system, a new start, the least Switch owners can do is hope, right? Even if it was not the case in the past, you can't blame owners for wishing third party support. 

Add in the fact that the cards seem slightly better aligned than the previous generations. Unlike the WiiU, the Switch seems to be financially viable (for now at the very least), and it is much more scalable than the Wii, so expecting third party support is not outrageous.