By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azelover said:
VGPolyglot said:

What was so revolutionary about the 3rd generation that the 5th generation wasn't?

Super Mario Bros., Duck Hunt, Final Fantasy, Megaman, Zelda. Just to name a few. They weren't in direct competition, people were really trying to creat and grow the market. Create a new space.

There was no such a thing after that with the regular consoles.

There is only so much you can do before it being similar to another thing. So 3rd gen had more "evolution" because it was less evoluted before. Simple as that.

ThisGuyFooks said:
DonFerrari said:

Yep, Wii lead to PS3 or X360 was even more significant than PS2 to Dreamcast.

10 Million and some change.

Ive never witnessed such dominance!

Yes, it was excruciating to see the leader almost tie with 2nd and 3rd... nothing like those silly 5:1, 6:1 or 15:1 PS2 was putting.

oniyide said:
Yeah. I dont care for the Xbox brand and their is a part of me that is glad they are getting trounced cause of the crap they tried to pull at the start of the gen. But its kinda sad at this point, MS IMHO keeps Sony in check more so than Nintendo does. And i dont think its beyond Sony to get silly again.

Current sales is enough to have Sony worried about MS and not be cucko again.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."