By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 22 August 2017
Edit Thread
Zkuq said:
ThisGuyFooks said:
Are we defending less games on a console? Really?

It is the developers duty to make the game work on consoles.

We have several RTS games that have worked perfectly on consoles, why some guys are insisting on the contrary?

RTS games that worked perfectly on consoles were typically developed with consoles in mind from the start. If that was done to AoE, people would probably hate it because it would effectively mean the game was dumbed down. No developer has duty to make any game work on any certain platform, it makes about as little sense as saying that it's the developer's duty to make it work on smartphones.

But a company that promises more exclusives on its console and the only real exclusive they are putting is on PC is kinda funny.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."