By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DonFerrari said:

It probably take even more than 3 years from investing in a new studio to bringing the first competent AAA game... but they have been saying they are improving their first party since before X1 release with several billions (I think it was 6) invested in making new studios...

Do you remember at the months prior to reveal people were trying to prove MS had more studios than Sony (after they made the investment) and we only basically only saw Gears and Halo coming from the new studios? And they have closed some of the studios before they even released anything.

Yeah, last gen was paintful towards the end for xbox because their exclusives were severely lacking and the investments they said they were making just wouldnt surfae. It was just bad. heh....not good at all. They used the Witcher 2 to save them but the last two years after Kinects hype fell off the face of the earth it was just that slow burn waiting for Gears in 2011 and Halo in 2012. They will end this gen the same way but in reverse. Gears will drop last. It suvks for the Xbox One X owners because they will only get two years with the console before they have to contemplate dropping another $500.

For me it have been much talk and excuses to keep a gamers first image with the fanbase and fans have forgave too much.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."