| fatslob-:O said: Well it looks like the RyZen train didn't last long ... |
People will keep buying Ryzen, it's still a solid product. And Intel will likely price itself higher as it has the faster product.
| fatslob-:O said: As I said before, Zen was just an experiment that turned out terribly good and it's Zen 2 that should really bring the fight to Intel ... |
"Experiment" is a bit far-fetched.
It was the foundations of what would come after... And like you, believe that Zen+ should make up for allot of Ryzens inherant shortcomings.
But that is probably still a good 9+ months away.
| fatslob-:O said: As long as Intel holds a competitive advantage in performance AMD's marketshare isn't going to change and Intel did a good job of responding fast with Coffee Lake ... |
Indeed.
AMD's marketshare was at it's zenith when it was soundly beating Intel for years.
Intels Anti-Competitive practices didn't help things though.
| fatslob-:O said: Price only factors in for enthusiasts or high performance client users when you offer the SAME performance. |
Price is always a factor. Always. To what degree really depends on the market segment.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
