Bandorr said:
Easier just ignore him imo. Because once it is narrowed down, they will just narrow it down again. "All that isn't AAA, that didn't sell well, that is niche, who cares about Japan" etc. It is an all or none argument for me. Either accept that "games" matter not "first party games" - or it is clear you are biased from the beginning and looking for one and only one answer. |
Well the guy have been doing damage control for X1 since 2014 on the basis that wouldn't be funny if sony dominate all. So he will downgrade any sony advantage and will upgrade any perceived MS advantage in a way that can give the impression that they are on equal ground.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
