Article: "America's Future Is Texas"

[DonFerrari]

Flilix said:

DonFerrari said:

Actually, nevermind. I had an answer for each of your arguments, but that would just bring us in a pointless discussion that could go on forever. The problem is, politics are constantly changing and there is a wide spectrum of things to consider.  'Left', 'right' and even 'fascism' are very vague words. It's hard to define them, and their meaning can change over time.

So I'll just try to keep it short.
You're talking about communist regimes, but the discussion was about antifa. While there are of course a lot of similarities between the two, there are also some major differences. Most importantly, antifascists are usually anarchist, so not authoritarian at all.

And while communist regimes are indeed authoritarian/totalitarian, that doesn't mean they're also fascist. Fascism is a very specific form of totalitarianism. It's 'invented' by Mussolini and his friend Hitler was a fascist too. Fascists are people who support the very specific ideas of these two leaders. Communists are obviously not fascists, since they hate eachother.

Sorry but you are just going tangent.

I know that the "anti-fascist" are anarchist, at least the movements calling themselves anti-fascist or anarchists. But most of the left wing movements will call other fascist when anyone disagree with a point they made, and guess who is the people who shut all disagreement? Yes the fascists.

The communist or socialism regimes as you may decide to call themselves are fascists regims, I know they "hate" each other, but the reason for that is power and control, not much differences in beliefs.

Try and point similarities and differences between real actions of nazifascism and socialism/comunism and also the ideals of their leaders. Now try to point how the nazifascism ideals have the same similarities and differences from classic right wing liberalism (as in Adam Smith, Mises, etc) and tell me how can something that is likely 90% more similar to socialism/comunism than to classic liberalism can be the extrem of classic liberalism and not another faceta of socialism/comunism?