By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jaicee said:
TH3-D0S3R said:
I will say this.

If you say one side is reasonable when the other is chaotic, it's clear there's a skewed bias in the author's writing. It shows a clear bias against one end of the spectrum, enabling the far Right (what we saw in Charlottesville) to go along with their motives. I highly disagree with what happened there, but in this process of demonizing them your only enabling them to commit more violence while looking foolish in the process.

Instead of demonizing one end of the spectrum resulting in both sides committing acts of violence against each other, why can't we just try to get along?

I'm tired of rightists blaming leftists and most particularly me personally for the fact that a neo-Nazi hit 34 people with his car at 40 miles per hour. And yes, that's exactly what you're doing. Will people PLEASE just quit trying to justify that?

You see here we go again.

The KKK and Neo's have always been a racist group. I am disgusted by the actions that took place at Charlottesville, and in no way would I advocate that. Quit throwing me into a group I have no interest associating with. I am not a racist pig who sympathizes with KKK members for saying that every act of violence from any extremist group (KKK, BLM, Neo Nazis, ANTIFA, etc.) should be seen exactly the same. I want any group that commits acts of violence specifically against other people of position or race to be seen as a domestic terrorist organization. Every. Single. One.

Your answer is exactly what is the problem with this article: broad generalizations that only try to demonize the other side. I am a Conservative, that doesn't mean I'm a white supremacist who was okay with the car plowing through the innocent crowd.

All I want is for the Riots in Baltimore or Berkley to be treated like they were here in Charlottesville, as acts of violence. Is that a problem?