| Scisca said:
Obviously, if AMD messed with the memory, like they did with RX 470 having worse memory, the gap will be more significant. All we can do is wait now, but I hope Vega 56 turns out to be epic |
Of course. Because you introduce a bottleneck into the pipeline which is the point I am trying to convey.
With that. Vega has arrived. And looking at Anandtechs benchmarks, the performance delta is a good 10-20% different between Vega 56 and Vega 64.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/11717/the-amd-radeon-rx-vega-64-and-56-review
| Chazore said: I don't need to think again, because I don't need to fully believe in the benches on those sites, since we're all sporting different hw. I find it rather short sighted to take the benches as fact across the board for many sets of hw and to then turn around and go "well yours is busted or something", when not even knowing how said hw is broken. |
The benchmarks are accurate, we know they are accurate because there are dozens of tech-sites on the internet which have gathered empirical evidence and compiled them into appropriate charts for you to peruse. - And they all tell the same story.
You are literally trying to justify your ancedotal point of view as something that is more accurate than some of the most reliable sources of information on the internet, that's not factual and not something I can adhere to. - And you will *never* change my mind on this... As I apply this standard of thinking to everything.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
