| CaptainExplosion said: Which is also why Nintendo must be the one to win this case. |
Not really ...
| Dravenet7 said: Aggression? "Now, unless you can respond with something that addresses that outside of "but it doesn't usually do that" despite Gamevice already expressing interest in doing just that, just stop. I'm not interested in getting caught in a repeating discussion." You basically make the same redundant point 5 times, not including this post. You completely dismiss people's request to discuss what Gamevice is actually suing over and state whatever you feel like stating. That isn't an aggressive post. It's fatigue from dealing with you. Which he clearly states by saying, "I'm not interested in getting caught in a repeating discussion." |
I didn't ask for your input. This is purely from my perspective ...
How exactly did I make the same redundant point, even '5' times for your exaggeration ?
And why exactly do people feel the need to discuss what Gamevice is suing Nintendo over ? Did everyone just suddenly miss what was addressed in the OP ?
