By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WolfpackN64 said:
DonFerrari said:

Well their filtering on Facebook is very left approach and things like violence against police, drugs incentivation and similar when denounced aren't banned and says it isn't against the community rules. Same with some hate speach against white, male, etc... while similar posts that would be on the opposite spectrum are quickly banned.

But as an institution itself I agree Google probably is neither, they just keep a left-view orientation to employees and public because that is what garner them more PR image advantage.

Google is all about PR, I doubt they really care about politics as long as they get something out of it.. And while many of the things you state are considered liberal in the US, I wouldn't call these very "left" (if you can really call liberals left) issues. But the perception of left and right is a bit different between the US and Europe.

I'm aware of that. But liberals in USA consider themselves to be left, and you are right about Google as for most companies. I consider myself classic liberal (british denomination) or minaquirst.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."