By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
HintHRO said:

You do realize you're the only one in this thread not getting how stupid these tests by Capcom are right? If Capcom wants to test if the Switch audience is willing to pay for their AAA games, they better base that on the sales of, for example, Resident Evil 7 and not an overpriced 26y old game while the competition is getting a collection of the same franchise at the same price. How can you expect a $40 SNES game to sell well (again they were lucky)? And if it doesn't sell well it immediately means Switch owners won't buy the newest Street Fighter or Resident Evil or Monster Hunter? That's just plain idiocracy. 

You do know that eveyone agreeing with something doesn't necessarily make that thing right, right?

Are you in any analyst position on new products, market assessment, strategy or the like? The opinion of 1000 laymen on a subject may carry less value than one expert.

So Capcom releasing test games on some genres with very little risk and doing a good data threatment to project capacity for larger products isn't something outrageous. And the fact that they don't say any other game or platform is a test of market, ALL releases are being under constant testing and monitoring.

Yeah well, the majority here are gamers and I think we can speak for ourselves. If most gamers here say they will buy a new Resident Evil/Monster Hunter/Street Fighter on Switch while not buying these ridiculous overpriced testports, then I do believe them and not some random analysts who are wrong most of the time anyway (Michael Pachter best example and of course many more failed predictions made in history).