fatslob-:O said:
You don't know that! (Neither do I for that matter.) There's far more to performance than just the drivers themselves. AMD could very well get into these so called 'dirty' gameworks tactics that the internet decries Nvidia for by paying game developers to accept their code contributions which has two paths (one that would have catastrophic performance for their competitor even on their own hardware too and the other code path containing the most optimized code with their driver extensions by detecting the vendor ID) Keep what eye on the future exactly ? (Tons of people bought GTX 680's over HD 7970's despite having a massive lead in current games.) |
I don't know, it's true, but we know that AMD has been using the 1080 in all its Vega demostrations, which gives us an idea of what segment of the market they're going after.
Also, do you really, really think that AMD has the power to get into a battle with Nvidia using propietary tech? C'mon, they're in a position where, if they do that, it could cause them more harm than good... while losing a lot of the goodwill they've gotten promoting the open formats over the years.
The 680/7970 case was an oddity. The 7xx0 cards were the first GCN cards and AMD had a lot of work to do with their drivers, and it also needed an extra bump in speed to 1,000 MHz to top the Nvidia card.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







