potato_hamster said:
It's pretty obvious what my argument has been this entire time. I've said it repeatedly. Somehow,you are having a hard time reading what I and others wrote and actually extracting the meaning of those words and undertstanding that text. It's as if you can't comprehend the notion that you're wrong so you perform these mental gynastics to skew these arguments into something they're not so you can dismiss them without consideration.
|
So you agree your only purpose here was to shitpost and derail the thread. It's creepy how much you care about what I can propose Sony to sell me. It's not for you to decide whether the idea is good or bad. Certainly not someone like you who hasn't shown he has technical knowledge about these matters. For example, starting from your first claim, you can not claim the retro market is niche, what study did you do to come to that conclusion? You've only shown me that you have too much time on your hands that you rather spend on internet arguments.
I can sum this thread with only 1 sentence: Potato hamster gets triggered about OP's idea and bores OP to death with his long winded posts about how the idea is bad with assumptions that it's too costly for Sony and the Nintendo approach is the only way to go about it.









