potato_hamster said:
So now you think literally copy and pasting the same thing over again makes what you're saying more credible or something? You're whole argument essentially boils down to "Sony is a yuge industry giant. They should be able to make anything I want them to make for a price I think it should cost based on that alone." Unfortunately for you, that thought process is completely detached from the reality that we live in. You're never going to see the console you're dreaming of for the price you're dreaming of, with the features you're dreaming of. That's as factual as Sony's status as an industry giant. |
I'll copy paste until you actually get it. It's not that hard. What you've been saying were nothing but assumptions and your opinions.
"Sony won't make product X, because Nintendo made prodyct Y so Sony should do it too, even though I have no idea how much the things I dream about cost", nor the fact that Sony's PS1 is mostly known for its 3rd party output unlike the Snes and has like 4 times as many games, nor the fact Sony would have an entirely different business strategy to go about if they explored going into the retro market and won't simply make a cheap toy console with a bunch of 3rd party games.
"this upscaler thing should cost a ton of money, it's a niche", or "why wud Sony update their already existing upscaler".
Literally everything you've said was irrelevant to the thread. A thread about what I want Sony to do to sell me a PS1 Classic. All this time you've been wasting my time trying to tell me I should not even want Sony to sell me what I hope for, congrats? Just because Nintendo did something, that should be the only way something should be done regardless of everything else, what a ridiculous premise to keep this pointless debate going.









