"because morality changes depending on the person"
you've already broken this discussion straight in your op
if morality is relativistic then there is nothing to discuss since there is no agreed upon standard for what is evil and what is good
" So, In saying that I cannot accept that there is such thing as an inherently good or evil person. Yes, there may be violent traits, but being as though we have survival instincts, I wouldn't consider that to be necessarily evil."
why should violent or harmful traits be suppressed if there is no standard between people "because morality changes depending on the person" for what is proper and what is not?
and the idea that someone who calls themself a socialist claiming that morality is relative is absurd in itself because socialism is largely about the group agreeing upon patterns of behavior that should be exhibited by all individuals in the group
