Senator John McCain casts deciding vote against "Skinny Repeal"

[DonFerrari]

sethnintendo said:

DonFerrari said:

Bribing the voters with promises based on taxpayers money is good then?

yes a law forbiding negotiation is a bad thing and government "taking care" to things is exactaly what enables most of it. A single body negotiating hundred billions dollars that can be used to buy not what is better to all, but what is more interesting to them is the problem. Socialist and the like fail to notice this exact point. You'll complain about politics being corrupt but then will say you want government to be even bigger. Or say corporations are greedy or that they explore their employees while their margins are like 10% and the government taxes on the people is 40%. Who is the real gready explorer?

Open the accountability of the to health companies in USA and see if their profit margins are 3x higher than other places.

Again. individual contributions solve nothing as they can mask all donations with proxy donors.

Public domations are better than secret ones because you know they are hapening. And that is why lobby was made legal.

We all know the hypocrisy of the rich leftwingers.

You don't need it. Will give you two very good examples of how much good rice regulation does... Brazil during 80's and early 90's and Venezuela of now... do you know what happens when government force or freeze prices? The products stop being made.

You mean the ones on verge of bankrucy and that are less than 10% the size of USA?

 

That's funny because I know for a fact that Norway is doing a hell a lot better than us financial wise. http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/01/11/oil-fund-norway-millionaires_n_4576887.html

You mean a country that is 10% the size, because you manage a microcompany just like a multinational.

And long term most of the wellfare states are decaying financially. And in the case in point you are basically pointing to a very lucrative and state milked commodity to fund it in a way that wouldn't work in USA.

I'll repeat to you again. Even in the best managed public service you'll have at least 3 cons. Impossibility of rightly gauging demand because of "free price", extra overhead because of government managing the money and investiment, adjusment to reality of each smaller reality because of the big size and in last case the lack of competition that make everything more costier to users and less efficient.