By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lawlight said:
pxrocks said:

no,what i meant is that they should divide a bigger budget  and invest them in two different style or genre AA game developed by two team inside a single studio.they can produce mutiple types of games with a single AAA budget in less time.they can do a lot of spin off too in the spare time.more first party output and more variety a win win for gamers and sony.right now they have the most diverse game library but first party wise it can be improved alot.and one thing is that sony never care for their ips they always ditch them and move to other things.why cant they keep the old ips and make new ones.tey abandoned a lot of good ips and its sad to see.

We still get the smaller games though. I think there is a balance between big AAA and the smaller titles. Just this year there are games like Gravity Rush 2, Matterfall, Hot Shots Golf, Knack 2 and Hidden Agendas. Even Lost Legacy is a smaller title. If you take away the AAA, that's also a way of losing variety in your games.

And I think it's not Sony that ditches old IPs, it's the devs. If a dev wants to go back to working on an old IP of theirs, I don't think Sony would stop them.

i know that and thats why i said that playstation has the most diverse linup of games right now but i am just giving my opinion on how sony should deal with the critisism or concern of samey tlou esque first party games as shown by some users here.tbh ps4 has a lot of diverse games and thats why its selling in alot of country where people dont even know about xbox or nintendo.same is applied for ps1 and ps2 and to certain extend ps3.but u cant satisfy everyone,there will be always someone complaining about sonys library.