| RJ_Sizzle said: Don't see what Rand is making such a big deal about. The marketing is bad so far, yes. But, that's only part of the issue. It's what people have been seeing of the game so far that's got people second-guessing it. The game has been downgraded from what was shown to us the first time, and the cloud destruction they've been hyping since the debut has yet to make a real world showing. Honestly, when the game looks like this, is environmental destruction even a big deal anymore? This isn't really a game series worth falling on your sword over. Crackdown has its fans I suppose, but let's face it, a lot of people were exposed to it because of the Halo betas. He says he wants the game to do well, but on what merits? There's not a lot there to champion. He should hope for it to be a solid game, not just expecting everyone to rally behind it just because it's an Xbox title. |
Agreed 100%
The game just looks....bland.
A) Graphics are underwhelming, even for a Celshaded game. The city looks unispiring and boring.
B) A.I. is a mess. For a game that is releasing relatively soon, i cant think of a way that developer could fix this problem on a short amount of time.
C) Physics are horrible. This game was touted as the Next Gen in physics tech, but looking at the demo i can 100% say that even GTA 4, a game from 2008 has WAY better physics, running on +10 old hardware.
D) The Cloud is nowhere to be seen. PR guys like Major Nelson has been evading the subject like a disease. Where the hell is The Cloud?!
E) Does the game even has a plot? Ok, so they changed the main character to a more familiar face (Quantum Break anybody?) but that is not the problem. Whats the point of the game? How does Multiplayer works? There are too many unanswered questions.
The Demos could have been played by God himself, and these issues would still exist. It wasnt the best idea to give the controller to Non-Gamers, but that is the least of my worries.
