| Slownenberg said: so you bolded and capitalized things you said in order to point out the parts where you are lying?? Why would you bold the parts of your comment that are obviously not true. Are you just trying to point out how much you can exaggerate?
Also, you realize the top 1% often pays far less of their income in taxes than the middle class. See, I didn't bold anything because my comment didn't have any lies or insane exaggerations. |
Lying ? LOL, you have no idea ...
The so called 'middle class' doesn't pay shit in terms of federal income tax compared to the top 10% ...
| deskpro2k3 said:
Nice pivot. Our founding fathers realized if our government was going to last as long as they hoped it did, it would need to be flexible. One way to make that happen was to add the amendment process. /end
|
Not to this degree and I bet they'd disavow our actions since they were against the tyranny of the majority ... (They'd find it absolutely ridiculous that the bottom 99% can dictate what to do with the income of the top 1%.)
There's a reason why a consitutional amendment requires ratification of 3/4ths of the state legislatures and not whatever the whims of the citizens are ...
