Pemalite said:
You place the display farther back. The perceived pixels per-inch gets better then too.
Agreed. 4k is just to demanding on hardware. Even Titan XP users will find they will need to upgrade sooner rather than later. I would never opt for anything less than 1440P these days. |
My monitor sits barely two feet away from me, and I could only add another one if, and only if, I mount the monitor into the wall. So big monitors are completely out of the equation for me.
Besides, using a smaller panel with a high resolution would mean less use of AA, probably only 2x.
A problem with going 1440p is that most manufacturers are so focused/obsessed with 4K that they don't make 1440p panels with HDR 10 or FALD, and it's a damn shame.
| Pemalite said: Seems mining might bomb soon. Might be worth keeping an eye on second hand outlets for something cheap. |
I've read that a new version of Etherium (or whatever it's called) might rool out in November, which could cause at this craze to bomb, or at least slow down for a little while.
*Edited because I made a little mess*
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.







