| ArnoldRimmer said: My favourite part about this whole ridiculous story is this: "The woman stated that she had information that individuals connected to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Mrs. Clinton."(Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/09/us/politics/trump-russia-kushner-manafort.html) So there are two possibilities: 1. The informations that Veselnitskaya tried to offer to the Trump team were correct. 1a. They donated money to Clinton, so they could lateron hand it over to Trump, and go "use this, proof we gave money to hilary", and then win the election. Make use of our badguy image (in american eyes) and make Hilary look bad, while in reality "our" guy (trump) wins the election (and no one knows it). In return, when your father is president, make sure to lift some trade sanctions against us. (quid pro quo) 2. The informations that Veselnitskaya tried to offer to the Trump team were bullshit. 2a. Veselnitskaya was acting on behalf of the Kremlin 2b. Veselnitskaya was NOT acting on behalf of the Kremlin |
added a 1a.
Donald Trump 'tried to roll back Russia sanctions the moment he got into power'
“There was serious consideration by the White House to unilaterally rescind the sanctions,” Dan Fried, who was serving as chief US coordinator for sanctions policy until he retired in late February, told Yahoo News. He said that he began receiving “panicky” phone calls from staffers in the State Department pleading with him to block Mr Trump’s efforts.







