Nuvendil said:
Fifa has finally caught up to Pokemon, but it's not a stronger brand. Battlefield, on the other hand, is not bigger than Pokemon and isn't in great shape after Battlefield Hardline. CoD is bigger, but CoD is the biggest or second biggest brand in the industry sooooo yeah, not shocking. Elder Scrolls is bigger, assuming it maintains its strenght from Skyrim. Destiny isn't. Overwatch isn't yet, but we'll see. Pokemon as a brand is still among the strongest out there. Mario has had a dip in sales, so that's a fair assessment, though as a brand Mario is still very strong (It ain't called "Nintendo Kart" for a reason) And there is denying that Nintendo was "massively lucky". They came in and did everything right in the early eighties to get the industry whipped into shape. If you think that was blind luck...then wow. And people accused ME of revisionism in this thread.... |
I'll admit FIFA has caught up, but I think its been mostly Europe that has been carrying the sales of the games, since its because of the obvious. For Pokemon, its still huge worldwide, not just in Japan. Like you, I don't know if I give games like Destiny and Overwatch a nod up in the ranks of Pokemon and Mario, at least not yet. I'd probably give Warcraft a nod within the top ranks, but other than GTA, CoD, and maybe FIFA, Mario and Pokemon remain among the strongest in the gaming industry. For the latter two, they've reached beyond gaming and have garned status in the overall pop culture. Even if you haven't played a video game, you would at least heard about Pokemon and Mario.
And I agree with your last statement and I think this notion about "Nintendo is lucky" is just as ridiculous as saying "Sony is lucky" during the 5th generation.