By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mnementh said:
pokoko said:

I quoted the factual part of what he said and simply left off the opinion part.  The factual part is neutral and allows people to form their own opinion.

That most of these games are ports or emulated games from other systems is relevant.  I don't know why you would think that it is not.  That they are 60fps (or not) really has nothing to do with Nintendo.  That some people in this thread are giving Nintendo credit really isn't disputable--just scroll up if you don't believe me.  Is that a big deal?  No, but it's still incorrect.

Why do you think it's downplaying to correct something that is incorrect?  Why would you want to obscure and discredit something that is true?

I'm going to ask you a question here and I really want a straight answer:  is it true or false that a lot of the games on that list are emulated classics?

I already answered your quesiton in the part you quoted: "Oh no, I don't deny that some of the games are emulations and some are visually not so demanding indie-games." So it's true. That is not the point at all. I never said that it is irrelevant that some are emulations, that part you made up.

But answer my question: If you state facts, why quote at all? Why not just state the fact? Why hide behind someone else by quoting something you easily could state yourself? And then actually misquote him.

Seriously, what are you even talking about?  My quote was word for word.

And your problem is that there are quotation marks?  That's the big problem you have?  Like I said, maybe you should analyze yourself for being defensive over a true statement while completely disregarding all the untrue statements in this thread and the selective quoting of the OP.