nanarchy on 11 July 2017
| superchunk said: Anyone not voting NES has no clue about the history of gaming. Anyone voting PS(anything) is clearly aging themselves on when they started gaming. Even other game devs point to one company and one specific point / console. |
anyone that thinks in absolute terms of it being a specific console with no other possible answers has no idea about gaming history as you could easily argue for any of the 3 consoles. the Magnavox, the Atari 2600 and the NES (I had them all), of those I would put the Atari 2600 first and the NES 3rd simply because without the Atari 2600 success their may not have even been a NES and while the Magnavox was revolutionarily it didn't have the mass market success of the 2600. I will agree on anyone voting for PS(anything) or Xbox (anything) obviously has zero knowledge of console history
