By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
specialk said:
epicurean said:

So wait - you're totally cool with the fact that Clinton's camp met with and worked with the Ukranian gov't to get damaging info on Trump simply because she lost the election. Just admit you're a Democrat shill then, because that's fucking ridiculous. What DTJ did doesn't come CLOSE (as far as we know) to what the dems did, yet you're completely up in arms over this, and Clinton's camp is completely non-noteworthy. What a joke.  

I didn't say that. 

I said that Hillary Clinton is not president. If you wish, I can elaborate. 

For practical reasons, I am much less concerned about the alleged impropriety of someone who hasn't held public office in four years and will likely never hold public office again, than I am about a smoking gun that shows that the circle of national security threats surrounding the most powerful man in the world consistently lied about their role in an attack on the US democracy. 

I'll be frank; given the above, engaging with you in a debate on the merits of a Daily Caller opinion piece seems like a colossal waste of time for everyone involved. 

If you think what Trump Jr did was a crime, the Clinton team did the exact same thing, and much worse. This was known BEFORE the results of the election, when everyone and their dog thought Clinton would win. Why would you not be oppossed to this crime then? I find it pretty hard to believe once she was elected that on that day you would've made a post and made a huge deal about it now that she was elected. Your insane amount of bias is showing.

I'd rather not discuss further as well with someone who would make such an insane arguement, anyway, so at least we agree on that much.



Owner of PS4 Pro, Xbox One, Switch, PS Vita, and 3DS