By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mnementh said:
pokoko said:

I think you really need to look at your own motivation here before talking down to people.  There was absolutely nothing wrong with pointing out that many of these games are emulated classics and I have no idea why you would get defensive over that--not if you really care about being objective.

Oh no, I don't deny that some of the games are emulations and some are visually not so demanding indie-games. But you let it look like it was said in that way by the DF-guy, which wasn't the case. Instead he was actually impressed with the number of games with high framerates. If you want to add something like that for some of these games it isn't that much of a feat, then you should articulate that opinion as your own, not as the opinion of someone who said actually something else.

I quoted the factual part of what he said and simply left off the opinion part.  The factual part is neutral and allows people to form their own opinion.

That most of these games are ports or emulated games from other systems is relevant.  I don't know why you would think that it is not.  That they are 60fps (or not) really has nothing to do with Nintendo.  That some people in this thread are giving Nintendo credit really isn't disputable--just scroll up if you don't believe me.  Is that a big deal?  No, but it's still incorrect.

Why do you think it's downplaying to correct something that is incorrect?  Why would you want to obscure and discredit something that is true?

I'm going to ask you a question here and I really want a straight answer:  is it true or false that a lot of the games on that list are emulated classics?