By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
iron_megalith said:

Anecdotal doesn't begin to paint the picture properly.

I checked the link, I saw only claims. But there is no data. So why am I again being quoted with no answers again?

We can all go bring up quantitative comparissons just for the hell of it but go ahead and do refute my point of this existing for a long time.

Because right now it's just he said she said thing.

"If you want something more objective, how about this:"
Please either pay more attention to what you are reading or stop willfully ignoring what I write. 

Ok. It's new because he's a member of congress right?

Alright I get you. That is indeed a more refined criteria to "prove" your point I guess.  

Disclaimer though. It's wikipedia. It's not all related to assault.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_the_United_States

Also highly doubt this list is even substantially near to how many journalists have experienced violence or was killed. Because to actually do that, we have to do some real "research". By we it means the both of us. But I'm not going to such lengths because my claim is simple. Feel free to do so if you want to prove your point so bad.

Also this entails only to those who have died not those who have been threatened only nor was attacked/assaulted personally but survived.

But yeah. It didn't exist before right?

Here's something to humor your thought, if whistle blowers like Snowden can get threats by exposing things what makes you think media/journalists won't have those?