Final-Fan said:
"If you want something more objective, how about this:" |
Ok. It's new because he's a member of congress right?
Alright I get you. That is indeed a more refined criteria to "prove" your point I guess.
Disclaimer though. It's wikipedia. It's not all related to assault.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_the_United_States
Also highly doubt this list is even substantially near to how many journalists have experienced violence or was killed. Because to actually do that, we have to do some real "research". By we it means the both of us. But I'm not going to such lengths because my claim is simple. Feel free to do so if you want to prove your point so bad.
Also this entails only to those who have died not those who have been threatened only nor was attacked/assaulted personally but survived.
But yeah. It didn't exist before right?
Here's something to humor your thought, if whistle blowers like Snowden can get threats by exposing things what makes you think media/journalists won't have those?