By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
numberwang said:
OhNoYouDont said:

This is a non-sequitur fallacy. Learn about what possible means in the context of philosophical discourse. It simply entails internal consistency. Simply because various systems are internally consistent does not mean that certain systems are not superior to other systems of thought. And that is what is argued in the literature.

So which one is the best system?

Well I would argue that all of the secular metaethical frameworks are superior to the arbitrariness of divine command theory, but I'm more inclined to non-cognitivism. 

You might want to review the Euthyphro dilemma if you find divine command theory to be a sufficient moral framework.

I have to say that these 5-6 word responses to my well-constructed statements is a bit disheartening and this will be my last reply to you since you do not seem to value my commentary and seem more interested in wasting my time.