Nem said:
Wow... you went places with that post. Wrong? No. Bear protects it's cub as you protect yours. Babies release a type of pheromones, especially if they cry. Quite honestly, i never looked up the process in detail. Anyways these pheromones are what makes you think they are cute and wanting to protect them, even if they aren't yours. There is more to it, but this should be enough for you to understand. I would need to open a medicine book or ask a specialist to know in more detail. These are hormonal processes and it's not usually something that is thought in general learning. It's university level stuff. Like... this is all lack of investigation you know... we are animals aswell. We are just smarter than the others.
I don't understand your point. Is this maybe cause the event's are better publicised? Because you feel more for those you feel are part of your tribe as they influence you more directly? How is any of this weird? |
the point i'm making is that empathy is not something that applies across the board
meaning that we are selective subconsciously (and consciously) about who or what we are empathetic towards... which means that its misguided to use empathy as some form of measure for morality
here's another example, lets say i'm poor and i have a sick wife i have to provide for and i stab and rob an innocent person in order to provide for her... in that situation i'm being preferential towards my kin over someone outside of my preferred social grouping
this is very easy to understand, i honestly don't see why you don't get it... the empathy argument really does not work for morality







