Final-Fan said:
iron_megalith said:
Wow. Way to put words in my mouth. Why not just quote me completely will you? There's a built in function for that or is it THAT hard to use?
Let me do that for you then.
Notice the important word.
"COMPLETELY"
Or is basic comprehenssion not your forte?
Memes won't add anything to your argument. If you're trying to be funny go ahead. I'll simply ignore your post.
|
Okay. Fine. You have "corrected" me. I ask my question a third time. What do you mean by "lying"? and what the HECK do you mean by "completely lying"? (such that it is different from merely "lying")
And lastly, what are all the parts you disagree with in my claims that (1)"it can be poor journalism without being lying, or even (2)reporting anything untrue" and "(3)If all they do is sensationalize it and give it ten times as much coverage as it needs while ignoring other stories, that's still very bad, but (4)it's not lying and (5)it doesn't make the story false"?
You have already been ignoring the arguments in my posts, which amounts to ignoring my posts. Please either stop doing it, or stop pretending not to.
|
Yes I didn't answer all your arguments. Your post was terrible with little to no substance for this conversation You're asking questions that are making this argument totally redundant.
If you don't count their selective footage practice as lying then I don't know what to say anymore. I'm done with this argument as you bring nothing to the table.
