By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
iron_megalith said:

Oh so we discount the fact that they are doing sensationalist yellow journalism just because "some guy" who works at CNN holds a position doesn't seem to have direct contact with whoever is coming up with there stories.

Seems legit.

I'm not saying it's good journalism.  What I'm saying is that it can be poor journalism without being lying, or even reporting anything untrue.  If all they do is sensationalize it and give it ten times as much coverage as it needs while ignoring other stories, that's still very bad, but it's not lying and it doesn't make the story false. 

You've ignored my request for you to define what you mean by "I'm not saying they are lying, but they are lying." 

Wow. Way to put words in my mouth. Why not just quote me completely will you? There's a built in function for that or is it THAT hard to use?

Let me do that for you then.

iron_megalith said:

I wouldn't say they're completely lying but they do come to a point where THEY ARE LYING.

 

Notice the important word.
"COMPLETELY"
Or is basic comprehenssion not your forte?

Memes won't add anything to your argument. If you're trying to be funny go ahead. I'll simply ignore your post.