Doe it really matter if God exists or not...?

[o_O.Q]

Aura7541 said:

John2290 said:

I don'y want to get in on this, man but you sure do use the word fallacy a lot, Your use of the word so often is a fallacioius, itself. Try some critical thinking and stop reusing the same terms and regurgitating the same information you have learned but don't seem to fully understand or have not questioned in your own mind. Think freely, there is no crime in using your own thought process in an arguement and not someone elses that you have read to prove you are a master debator, it just makes you transparent in a much worse cocky sort of way. Again, Not getting into your discussion here nor am I insulting you, just some advice, I just couldn't hold my tounge.

I am the skeptic in the context of the conversation. I am not the one making the positive claims and therefore, the burden of proof falls on o_O.Q. I already laid out the framework for him to prove me wrong, but he has not even gone past Step 1. Point being, if your claim is based on a fallacy and you try to substantiate the claim with another one, you're going to have a hard time convincing people to buy your argument.

o_O.Q said:

 

lol... so all you can do is call out fallacies without elaborating on them?

this is absolutely hilarous, i am honestly lost for words

 

i'll try one last time

"""all i am saying is that this is similar to what has been done with concepts associated with a god"

can you elaborate on how this employs the god of the gaps fallacy?""

I call you out on your fallacies because your arguments do not hold up. It is as simple as that. I also already noted that I elaborated on my reasoning, so the fact that you're repeatedly asking me the same question is a demonstration of your lack of reading comprehension rather than a demonstration of my lack of elaboration. The burden of proof is still on you and you still have not proven the causality between supernatural events and morality. Having offered zero citations, your argument is just as credible as the universe being created by a pink unicorn. Now that is hilarious.

Well, I've given you more than plenty of chances, but alas you just don't have the ability to make arguments that hold up to scrutiny.

 

"I call you out on your fallacies because your arguments do not hold up."

but... you haven't actually demonstrated how any of my arguments haven't held up

so far all you have achieved is to call historical fact (that people have assigned values to the concept of gods) a fallacy

 

"you still have not proven the causality between supernatural events and morality."

lol which was not my claim... you would do well to actually read what i've said instead of attacking a strawman

 

"Well, I've given you more than plenty of chances"

well i can't actually move forwards if you can't actually address what i'm saying lol or simply resort to calling facts fallacies

 

...i mean even now you still haven't realised lol