Doe it really matter if God exists or not...?

[Aura7541]

John2290 said:

Aura7541 said:

Round and round the fallacious carousel you go...

So you resorted to the same old Proof by Assertion and refuse to address your God of the Gaps fallacy. Looks like you have resorted to the Argument from Silence fallacy, too. So let's just recap. Your claims are solely dependent on Proof by Assertion and the God of the Gaps fallacies. When asked to prove your assertions to be correct, you have not fulfilled your burden of proof as you have provided absolutely zero citations and no direct evidence, and you also resorted to the ad nauseaum fallacy. And as the cherry on top, you responded to my continued skepticism with an Argument from Silence fallacy. Your thinking process is extremely predicable and can be easily refuted, so feel free to put in your last sophist words because the fallacious carousel is not my kind of ride.

I don'y want to get in on this, man but you sure do use the word fallacy a lot, Your use of the word so often is a fallacioius, itself. Try some critical thinking and stop reusing the same terms and regurgitating the same information you have learned but don't seem to fully understand or have not questioned in your own mind. Think freely, there is no crime in using your own thought process in an arguement and not someone elses that you have read to prove you are a master debator, it just makes you transparent in a much worse cocky sort of way. Again, Not getting into your discussion here nor am I insulting you, just some advice, I just couldn't hold my tounge.

I am the skeptic in the context of the conversation. I am not the one making the positive claims and therefore, the burden of proof falls on o_O.Q. I already laid out the framework for him to prove me wrong, but he has not even gone past Step 1. Point being, if your claim is based on a fallacy and you try to substantiate the claim with another one, you're going to have a hard time convincing people to buy your argument.

o_O.Q said:

Aura7541 said:

Round and round the fallacious carousel you go...

So you resorted to the same old Proof by Assertion and refuse to address your God of the Gaps fallacy. Looks like you have resorted to the Argument from Silence fallacy, too. So let's just recap. Your claims are solely dependent on Proof by Assertion and the God of the Gaps fallacies. When asked to prove your assertions to be correct, you have not fulfilled your burden of proof as you have provided absolutely zero citations and no direct evidence, and you also resorted to the ad nauseaum fallacy. And as the cherry on top, you responded to my continued skepticism with an Argument from Silence fallacy. Your thinking process is extremely predicable and can be easily refuted, so feel free to put in your last sophist words because the fallacious carousel is not my kind of ride.

 

lol... so all you can do is call out fallacies without elaborating on them?

this is absolutely hilarous, i am honestly lost for words

 

i'll try one last time

"""all i am saying is that this is similar to what has been done with concepts associated with a god"

can you elaborate on how this employs the god of the gaps fallacy?""

I call you out on your fallacies because your arguments do not hold up. It is as simple as that. I also already noted that I elaborated on my reasoning, so the fact that you're repeatedly asking me the same question is a demonstration of your lack of reading comprehension rather than a demonstration of my lack of elaboration. The burden of proof is still on you and you still have not proven the causality between supernatural events and morality. Having offered zero citations, your argument is just as credible as the universe being created by a pink unicorn. Now that is hilarious.

Well, I've given you more than plenty of chances, but alas you just don't have the ability to make arguments that hold up to scrutiny. But let me guess, you're going to ask me that same question even though I have already elaborated a la ad nauseaum.