By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shadow1980 said:
The only thing worse than a sore loser is a sore winner. Being upset over losing is normal. Rubbing a victory in someone's face is just a dick move.

That stuff I cannot stand. I will leave at the end of the match weather my team wins or not. There was a match in Overwatch. We lost Hanamura on Attack. Then this guy was being a snarky asshole and was like: I just started playing symetra. He was being an arrogant prick with a character that is primarily spam and no need of aiming. I'm Zarya surviving 5 people shooting at me. While their team just walks 10 feet to point. Same goes if a person on my team becomes some ass. I will tell them to stop. If they don't, I just leave.

I do agree games do need surrender options. Because either way. If the team agrees its not worth the time to continue. They will just stop. I've had in a Overwatch comp match before. Be completly outmatched. We all agreed to just suicide off the map for the remainder of the round. It was a waste of time. Which wouldn't happen if we all could do a majority vote on ending the game.

AsGryffynn said:
SvennoJ said:

Perhaps instead of informing the 'winner' the 'loser' has quit, the game could silently replace the 'loser's input with AI as not to hurt the feelings of the 'winner' when his oppenent quits. That way everybody is happy! The 'winner' gets to stomp all over the AI believing he beat a weak human opponent, while the 'loser' is already off finding a more enjoyable match.

This sounds like a wonderful way to kill bona fide gaming communities... 

If the MP aspect becomes too one sided. The comunity will die anyway.