o_O.Q said:
""all i am saying is that this is similar to what has been done with concepts associated with a god" can you elaborate on how this employs the god of the gaps fallacy?"
lol so your lack of a response shows you can't actually elaborate on how this uses the god of the gaps fallacy? isn't that a proof by assertion fallacy? lol
to reiterate the positive claim i made is historical fact in that throughout history values have been attributed to gods the other positive claim i made is that objective morality is impossible without the concept of a god and so far no one including you has been able to raise a counterargument
"You also have not proven the causality yet since correlation does not mean causation."
and this is in regards to what exactly? are you really a moderator? |
Round and round the fallacious carousel you go...
So you resorted to the same old Proof by Assertion and refuse to address your God of the Gaps fallacy. Looks like you have resorted to the Argument from Silence fallacy, too. So let's just recap. Your claims are solely dependent on Proof by Assertion and the God of the Gaps fallacies. When asked to prove your assertions to be correct, you have not fulfilled your burden of proof as you have provided absolutely zero citations and no direct evidence, and you also resorted to the ad nauseaum fallacy. And as the cherry on top, you responded to my continued skepticism with an Argument from Silence fallacy. Your thinking process is extremely predicable and can be easily refuted, so feel free to put in your last sophist words because the fallacious carousel is not my kind of ride.
