Aura7541 said:
o_O.Q said:
"all i am saying is that this is similar to what has been done with concepts associated with a god"
can you elaborate on how this employs the god of the gaps fallacy?
how does acknowledging that people have associated certain values with gods a fallacy? lol
is this not historical fact?
"97% of matter being invisible proving that the supernatural exists is also another "God of the Gaps" fallacy because you don't provide the link nor have you proved the causality."
well as far as i know the supernatural is defined as anything outside of the limits of our abilities of perception so...
here is the definition : "(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature."
and again i have to ask... do you truly believe that we are currently at the apex of understanding of the universe and will never in the future find phenomena that were outside of the limits of our perception? if so you are exceeding arrogant without justification for it
"Claiming that we cannot have objective reality"
i did by accident in my original post and corrected it to "morality"
are you reffering to morailty or reality?
with regards to morality i stand by that claim
"You first make a "God of the Gaps" fallacy and attempt to support it with unproven assertions"
you would do well to list the unproven assertions i've made btw
|
I already listed the unproven assertions. It's your problem that you can't read. The burden of proof rests on the person making the positive claim. You also have not proven the causality yet since correlation does not mean causation.
|
""all i am saying is that this is similar to what has been done with concepts associated with a god"
can you elaborate on how this employs the god of the gaps fallacy?"
lol so your lack of a response shows you can't actually elaborate on how this uses the god of the gaps fallacy?
isn't that a proof by assertion fallacy? lol
to reiterate the positive claim i made is historical fact in that throughout history values have been attributed to gods
the other positive claim i made is that objective morality is impossible without the concept of a god and so far no one including you has been able to raise a counterargument
"You also have not proven the causality yet since correlation does not mean causation."
and this is in regards to what exactly?
are you really a moderator?
