Doe it really matter if God exists or not...?

[Aura7541]

o_O.Q said:

Aura7541 said:

You resorted to the "God of the Gaps" fallacy again, which also makes it an ad nauseaum fallacy. Repeating the same claim isn't going to help your argument. Also, 97% of matter being invisible proving that the supernatural exists is also another "God of the Gaps" fallacy because you don't provide the link nor have you proved the causality.

Claiming that we cannot have objective reality without the concept of god is also a Proof by Assertion fallacy considering that you have provided no direct evidence that supports your claim and again, nor have you proven the causality. Ultimately, your claims are solely reliant on the "God of the Gaps", Proof by Assertion, and ad nauseaum fallacies (and in that order, too). You first make a "God of the Gaps" fallacy and attempt to support it with unproven assertions (Proof by Assertion) without fulfilling your burden of proof (which falls on the person making the positive claim), and then when someone points out at the flaws of your argument, you go through that cycle again (ad nauseaum). The pattern is highly predictable.

 

"all i am saying is that this is similar to what has been done with concepts associated with a god"

can you elaborate on how this employs the god of the gaps fallacy?

how does acknowledging that people have associated certain values with gods a fallacy? lol

is this not historical fact?

 

"97% of matter being invisible proving that the supernatural exists is also another "God of the Gaps" fallacy because you don't provide the link nor have you proved the causality."

 

well as far as i know the supernatural is defined as anything outside of the limits of our abilities of perception so...

here is the definition : "(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature."

 

and again i have to ask... do you truly believe that we are currently at the apex of understanding of the universe and will never in the future find phenomena that were outside of the limits of our perception? if so you are exceeding arrogant without justification for it

 

"Claiming that we cannot have objective reality"

i did by accident in my original post and corrected it to "morality"

are you reffering to morailty or reality?

with regards to morality i stand by that claim

 

"You first make a "God of the Gaps" fallacy and attempt to support it with unproven assertions"

you would do well to list the unproven assertions i've made btw

I already listed the unproven assertions. It's your problem that you can't read. The burden of proof rests on the person making the positive claim. You also have not proven the causality yet since correlation does not mean causation.