By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sethnintendo said:
irstupid said:

What does that prove.

All it shows to me is that approval ratings are taken the same way the pre-vote polling was done. They sat in their New York, LA and so on districts and polled peopel there. Compeltely leaving out majority of the country. 

And quit saying Majority dont' like trump and majority like Hilary or some shit. DIdn't less than half elegibel voters vote. Don't matter who won, I woudl take it that most people hate the winner when we are talking what 24-25% of people voted for that canidate. 

 

Are you drunk or did you start taking spelling lessons from Trump's tweets?

The point is all these polls are takign polls from just one place and not a good representation of the overal feel of america.

Be like if your doing a survey in school and you hand out all of your survey questions to one class and then use that to prove how the rest of the school feels. And not just one class, but a biased class. Like going into Band class and asking the class what they think about the arts versus sports. Essentially a worthless poll.

When doign their political polls, they sit in big cities to get large samples, cause everyoen knows larger samples are always better right? Well, not if all those large samples are from teh same "class" They just poll tons of people in big cities and then just use historical data to guess how the rest would go. Watching the election night youc oudl see the many many times they were surprised on these counties outside the city that voted Obama the last two elections yet went to Trump. That was because they never polled in those places. THey only care about the big cities. They predict Michigan by Detroit polling, ect.