Soundwave said:
No the Russians would not want Clinton to win. Obama imposed crippling sanctions on Russia after they invaded Crimea, they want those sanctions lifted and Trump has many Russian friendlies in his inner circle. Chief among those sanctions was a crippling of massive multi billion dollar deal with Exxon Mobil. Guess who's Trump's Secreatary of State choice is ... Rex Tillerson, former CEO of Exxon Mobil, given the "medal of friendship" from Putin. But I'm sure that's all just a coincidence. Trump's "America First" is just an empty slogan. Where is the currency manipulation hammer he claimed he would put on China within the first 30 days of his presidency? Yeah he sure bailed out of that fast. It's all bullshit. He's a snake oil salesman he'll say whatever he needs to if it sounds like a nice slogan. Much like "Drain the Swamp" ... by hiring the most millionaire/billionaire loaded cabinet ever. You were never going to find anything conclusive. If it's hacking, Russia can easily just say "well, they're not affiliated directly to us, that could be anyone, it just happened to use a Russian script and be traced back to Russian hackers, but we don't control what they do". You think they're dumb enough to have some "official government hacking agency" that would leave behind an obvious stamp and they get caught red handed. |
Oh yeah, freezing US assets, that stopped Russia from invading Crimea. Obama's sanctions wouldn't influence Putin in any way, but they were harsh. Give me a break. Obama was a shill willing to sell himself out to anyone just to say hey guys, I did this (Paris Accords, Iran deal, etc.). Obama was the expert of selling the idea of making huge deals without actually doing it, he was able to be bought out by other groups in order to push an agenda.
To be fair, Trump has done quite a bit in his first 6 months in office. I knew he wasn't going to do everything immediately, based on how Washington works and for the pure fact that Congressional Democrats would try to push a lot off so things would go as slowly as possible. President's throughout history have not necessarily gotten everything done in the first 100 days (Obama sure didn't), so holding Trump to the 'He Has to Do Everything He Promised in the First Month or He's the Worst' is incoherently wrong.
Lastly, there's no proof. Nothing.