By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xxain on 27 June 2017
Edit Thread
Ka-pi96 said:
Xxain said:

Its not stupid. I'm already said this this dumb direction. Its ridiculous to be complaining about it not being something else when its was openly announced that way. We knew knew from the gitty up that it was not going to be a Strategy game. So why still hold accoutable for not being what it said it wasnt. If I tell you there is a sandwich in your lunchbox, are you going to expect a Pizza? 

Well, no. But knowing there's a sandwich in there beforehand still isn't going to completely get rid of the disappointment of it just being a sandwich.

The same is true for this game. Sure it would have been more disappointing if it had promised to be like the original games and then deviated massively anyway. But knowing beforehand doesn't change the fact that people will be thinking about what could have been instead.

But there must come a time where you have to except that it is sandwich. Opening the lunchbox after knowing should not be a OMG moment. The game should be judged for what it is. Revolution could have been amazing, but it wouldn't have stopped the butthurt.