By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xxain said:
JRPGfan said:
I was afraid of this.... they shouldnt have changed the formula that much.

Changing the formula is not the problem. Revolution is suppose to be a splinter series. It was never marketed as anything else. What the problem is they choose close range combat as the focus. Why? If this was like a RPG shooter/real time strategy game it would have been much better. 

UltimateUnknown disagree's with you.  Also see the quotes by polygon & IGN.

UltimateUnknown said:
As a hardcore fan of the original VC, it pains me to say that I could see this coming from the first time I played through the demo of the game. They took the unique and strategic gameplay of the VC series and watered it down into some of the most bland action RPG gameplay I could imagine. How they managed this, I do not know. I had incredibly high expectations from this studio and I can only hope they go back and make a true sequel to the Chronicles series, or at the very least a full on remake of VC3 on PS4.

 

I havnt even played the demo of this, but I could tell from the videos back then, that it was too changed.

Imo you shouldnt take what people love about a game series and then just throw it out the window, thats a good way to get people angry with you.

Even god of war, haveing more "narrative" doesnt mean they throw everything else that was god of war out, they added instead of subtracting